Connected space

Connected and disconnected subspaces of R²

From top to bottom: red space A, pink space B, yellow space C and orange space D are all connected spaces, whereas green space E (made of subsets E₁, E₂, E₃, and E₄) is disconnected. Furthermore, A and B are also simply connected (genus 0), while C and D are not: C has genus 1 and D has genus 4.

In topology and related branches of mathematics, a connected space is a topological space that cannot be represented as the union of two or more disjointnon-emptyopen subsets. Connectedness is one of the principal topological properties that distinguish topological spaces.

A subset of a topological space ${\displaystyle X}$ is a connected set if it is a connected space when viewed as a subspace of ${\displaystyle X}$.

Some related but stronger conditions are path connected, simply connected, and ${\displaystyle n}$-connected. Another related notion is locally connected, which neither implies nor follows from connectedness.

A topological space${\displaystyle X}$ is said to be disconnected if it is the union of two disjoint non-empty open sets. Otherwise, ${\displaystyle X}$ is said to be connected. A subset of a topological space is said to be connected if it is connected under its subspace topology. Some authors exclude the empty set (with its unique topology) as a connected space, but this article does not follow that practice.

Historically this modern formulation of the notion of connectedness (in terms of no partition of ${\displaystyle X}$ into two separated sets) first appeared (independently) with N.J. Lennes, Frigyes Riesz, and Felix Hausdorff at the beginning of the 20th century. See (Wilder 1978) for details.

Connectedness defines an equivalence relation in the following sense: given two points ${\displaystyle x,y}$ in a topological space ${\displaystyle X}$, we write ${\displaystyle x\sim y}$ if ${\displaystyle x,y}$ belong to the same connected subset. Then this ${\displaystyle \sim }$ is an equivalence relation.^[2]

• The closed interval ${\displaystyle [0,2)}$ in the standardsubspace topology is connected; although it can, for example, be written as the union of ${\displaystyle [0,1)}$ and ${\displaystyle [1,2),}$ the second set is not open in the chosen topology of ${\displaystyle [0,2).}$
• The union of ${\displaystyle [0,1)}$ and ${\displaystyle (1,2]}$ is disconnected; both of these intervals are open in the standard topological space ${\displaystyle [0,1)\cup (1,2].}$
• ${\displaystyle (0,1)\cup \{3\}}$ is disconnected.
• The space ${\displaystyle X=\{a,b\}}$ with the indiscrete topology is connected, since its only open sets are ${\displaystyle \varnothing }$ and ${\displaystyle X}$.
• The subspace ${\displaystyle Y=[-1,0)\cup (0,1]\subset \mathbb {R} }$ is not connected. Indeed, the sets ${\displaystyle [-1,0)}$ and ${\displaystyle (0,1]}$ are nonempty, disjoint, and open in the subspace topology on ${\displaystyle Y}$, and together form a separation of ${\displaystyle Y}$.
• A convex subset of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ is connected; it is actually simply connected.
• A Euclidean plane excluding the origin, ${\displaystyle (0,0),}$ is connected, but is not simply connected. The three-dimensional Euclidean space without the origin is connected, and even simply connected. In contrast, the one-dimensional Euclidean space without the origin is not connected.
• A Euclidean plane with a straight line removed is not connected since it consists of two half-planes.
• ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$, the space of real numbers with the usual topology, is connected.
• The Sorgenfrey line is disconnected.^[5]
• If even a single point is removed from ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$, the remainder is disconnected. However, if even a countable infinity of points are removed from ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$, where ${\displaystyle n\geq 2,}$ the remainder is connected. If ${\displaystyle n\geq 3}$, then ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ remains simply connected after removal of countably many points.
• Any topological vector space, e.g. any Hilbert space or Banach space, over a connected field (such as ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$ or ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} }$), is simply connected.
• Every discrete topological space with at least two elements is disconnected, in fact such a space is totally disconnected. The simplest example is the discrete two-point space.^[6]
• On the other hand, a finite set might be connected. For example, the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring consists of two points and is connected. It is an example of a Sierpiński space.
• The Cantor set is totally disconnected; since the set contains uncountably many points, it has uncountably many components.
• If a space ${\displaystyle X}$ is homotopy equivalent to a connected space, then ${\displaystyle X}$ is itself connected.
• The topologist's sine curve is an example of a set that is connected but is neither path connected nor locally connected.
• The general linear group${\displaystyle \operatorname {GL} (n,\mathbb {R} )}$ (that is, the group of ${\displaystyle n}$-by-${\displaystyle n}$ real, invertible matrices) consists of two connected components: the one with matrices of positive determinant and the other of negative determinant. In particular, it is not connected. In contrast, ${\displaystyle \operatorname {GL} (n,\mathbb {C} )}$ is connected. More generally, the set of invertible bounded operators on a complex Hilbert space is connected.
• The spectra of commutative local ring and integral domains are connected. More generally, the following are equivalent^[7]
  1. The spectrum of a commutative ring ${\displaystyle R}$ is connected
  2. Every finitely generated projective module over ${\displaystyle R}$ has constant rank.
  3. ${\displaystyle R}$ has no idempotent${\displaystyle \neq 0,1}$ (i.e., ${\displaystyle R}$ is not a product of two rings in a nontrivial way).

An example of a space that is not connected is a plane with an infinite line deleted from it. Other examples of disconnected spaces (that is, spaces which are not connected) include the plane with an annulus removed, as well as the union of two disjoint closed disks, where all examples of this paragraph bear the subspace topology induced by two-dimensional Euclidean space.

A path-connected space is a stronger notion of connectedness, requiring the structure of a path. A path from a point ${\displaystyle x}$ to a point ${\displaystyle y}$ in a topological space${\displaystyle X}$ is a continuous function ${\displaystyle f}$ from the unit interval${\displaystyle [0,1]}$ to ${\displaystyle X}$ with ${\displaystyle f(0)=x}$ and ${\displaystyle f(1)=y}$. A path-component of ${\displaystyle X}$ is an equivalence class of ${\displaystyle X}$ under the equivalence relation which makes ${\displaystyle x}$ equivalent to ${\displaystyle y}$ if and only if there is a path from ${\displaystyle x}$ to ${\displaystyle y}$.^[8] The space ${\displaystyle X}$ is said to be path-connected (or pathwise connected or ${\displaystyle \mathbf {0} }$-connected) if there is exactly one path-component.^[9]

Equivalently, a path-component of ${\displaystyle X}$ is a maximal path-connected subset of ${\displaystyle X}$ (to see the equivalence, note a path-component in the previous sense is path-connected).^[10]

Every path-connected space is connected.^[11] The converse is not always true: examples of connected spaces that are not path-connected include the extended long line${\displaystyle L^{*}}$ and the topologist's sine curve.

Subsets of the real line${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$ are connected if and only if they are path-connected; these subsets are the intervals and rays of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$. Also, open subsets of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ or ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}$ are connected if and only if they are path-connected. Additionally, connectedness and path-connectedness are the same for finite topological spaces.^[12]

A space ${\displaystyle X}$ is said to be arc-connected or arcwise connected if any two topologically distinguishable points can be joined by an arc, which is an embedding${\displaystyle f:[0,1]\to X}$. An arc-component of ${\displaystyle X}$ is a maximal arc-connected subset of ${\displaystyle X}$; or equivalently an equivalence class of the equivalence relation of whether two points can be joined by an arc or by a path whose points are topologically indistinguishable.

Every Hausdorff space that is path-connected is also arc-connected;^[13] more generally this is true for a ${\displaystyle \Delta }$-Hausdorff space, which is a space where each image of a path is closed. An example of a space which is path-connected but not arc-connected is given by the line with two origins; its two copies of ${\displaystyle 0}$ can be connected by a path but not by an arc.

Intuition for path-connected spaces does not readily transfer to arc-connected spaces. Let ${\displaystyle X}$ be the line with two origins. The following are facts whose analogues hold for path-connected spaces, but do not hold for arc-connected spaces:

• Continuous image of arc-connected space may not be arc-connected: for example, a quotient map from an arc-connected space to its quotient with countably many (at least 2) topologically distinguishable points cannot be arc-connected due to too small cardinality.
• Arc-components may not be disjoint. For example, ${\displaystyle X}$ has two overlapping arc-components.
• Arc-connected product space may not be a product of arc-connected spaces. For example, ${\displaystyle X\times \mathbb {R} }$ is arc-connected, but ${\displaystyle X}$ is not.
• Arc-components of a product space may not be products of arc-components of the marginal spaces. For example, ${\displaystyle X\times \mathbb {R} }$ has a single arc-component, but ${\displaystyle X}$ has two arc-components.
• If arc-connected subsets have a non-empty intersection, then their union may not be arc-connected. For example, the arc-components of ${\displaystyle X}$ intersect, but their union is not arc-connected.

A topological space is said to be locally connected at a point ${\displaystyle x}$ if every neighbourhood of ${\displaystyle x}$ contains a connected open neighbourhood. It is locally connected if it has a base of connected sets. It can be shown that a space ${\displaystyle X}$ is locally connected if and only if every component of every open set of ${\displaystyle X}$ is open.

Similarly, a topological space is said to be locally path-connected if it has a base of path-connected sets. An open subset of a locally path-connected space is connected if and only if it is path-connected. This generalizes the earlier statement about ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$ and ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{n}}$, each of which is locally path-connected. More generally, any topological manifold is locally path-connected.

Locally connected does not imply connected, nor does locally path-connected imply path connected. A simple example of a locally connected (and locally path-connected) space that is not connected (or path-connected) is the union of two separated intervals in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }$, such as ${\displaystyle (0,1)\cup (2,3)}$.

A classic example of a connected space that is not locally connected is the so-called topologist's sine curve, defined as ${\displaystyle T=\{(0,0)\}\cup \left\{\left(x,\sin \left({\tfrac {1}{x}}\right)\right):x\in (0,1]\right\}}$, with the Euclidean topologyinduced by inclusion in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{2}}$.

The intersection of connected sets is not necessarily connected.

The union of connected sets is not necessarily connected, as can be seen by considering ${\displaystyle X=(0,1)\cup (1,2)}$.

Each ellipse is a connected set, but the union is not connected, since it can be partitioned into two disjoint open sets ${\displaystyle U}$ and ${\displaystyle V}$.

This means that, if the union ${\displaystyle X}$ is disconnected, then the collection ${\displaystyle \{X_{i}\}}$ can be partitioned into two sub-collections, such that the unions of the sub-collections are disjoint and open in ${\displaystyle X}$ (see picture). This implies that in several cases, a union of connected sets is necessarily connected. In particular:

1. If the common intersection of all sets is not empty (${\textstyle \bigcap X_{i}\neq \emptyset }$), then obviously they cannot be partitioned to collections with disjoint unions. Hence the union of connected sets with non-empty intersection is connected.
2. If the intersection of each pair of sets is not empty (${\displaystyle \forall i,j:X_{i}\cap X_{j}\neq \emptyset }$) then again they cannot be partitioned to collections with disjoint unions, so their union must be connected.
3. If the sets can be ordered as a "linked chain", i.e. indexed by integer indices and ${\displaystyle \forall i:X_{i}\cap X_{i+1}\neq \emptyset }$, then again their union must be connected.
4. If the sets are pairwise-disjoint and the quotient space${\displaystyle X/\{X_{i}\}}$ is connected, then X must be connected. Otherwise, if ${\displaystyle U\cup V}$ is a separation of X then ${\displaystyle q(U)\cup q(V)}$ is a separation of the quotient space (since ${\displaystyle q(U),q(V)}$ are disjoint and open in the quotient space).^[14]

The set difference of connected sets is not necessarily connected. However, if ${\displaystyle X\supseteq Y}$ and their difference ${\displaystyle X\setminus Y}$ is disconnected (and thus can be written as a union of two open sets ${\displaystyle X_{1}}$ and ${\displaystyle X_{2}}$), then the union of ${\displaystyle Y}$ with each such component is connected (i.e. ${\displaystyle Y\cup X_{i}}$ is connected for all ${\displaystyle i}$).

• Main theorem of connectedness: Let ${\displaystyle X}$ and ${\displaystyle Y}$ be topological spaces and let ${\displaystyle f:X\rightarrow Y}$ be a continuous function. If ${\displaystyle X}$ is (path-)connected then the image ${\displaystyle f(X)}$ is (path-)connected. This result can be considered a generalization of the intermediate value theorem.
• Every path-connected space is connected.
• In a locally path-connected space, every open connected set is path-connected.
• Every locally path-connected space is locally connected.
• A locally path-connected space is path-connected if and only if it is connected.
• The closure of a connected subset is connected. Furthermore, any subset between a connected subset and its closure is connected.
• The connected components are always closed (but in general not open)
• The connected components of a locally connected space are also open.
• The connected components of a space are disjoint unions of the path-connected components (which in general are neither open nor closed).
• Every quotient of a connected (resp. locally connected, path-connected, locally path-connected) space is connected (resp. locally connected, path-connected, locally path-connected).
• Every product of a family of connected (resp. path-connected) spaces is connected (resp. path-connected).
• Every open subset of a locally connected (resp. locally path-connected) space is locally connected (resp. locally path-connected).
• Every manifold is locally path-connected.
• Arc-wise connected space is path connected, but path-wise connected space may not be arc-wise connected
• Continuous image of arc-wise connected set is arc-wise connected.

تحتوي الرسوم البيانية على مجموعات فرعية متصلة مساريًا، وهي تلك المجموعات الفرعية التي يوجد بين كل زوج من النقاط مسار من الحواف يربط بينهما. ومع ذلك، ليس من الممكن دائمًا إيجاد بنية طوبولوجية على مجموعة النقاط تُنتج نفس المجموعات المتصلة. الرسم البياني ذو الخمس دورات (وأي رسم بياني آخر)${\displaystyle n}$- دورة مع${\displaystyle n>3}$(غريب) هو أحد هذه الأمثلة.

نتيجةً لذلك، يمكن صياغة مفهوم الاتصال بشكل مستقل عن طوبولوجيا الفضاء. بمعنى آخر، توجد فئة من الفضاءات المتصلة تتألف من مجموعات تحتوي على مجموعات فرعية متصلة تحقق بديهيات الاتصال؛ وتُعرف تشاكلاتها بالدوال التي تربط المجموعات المتصلة ببعضها ( مسكات وبوهاجيار ، 2006 ) . تُعد الفضاءات الطوبولوجية والرسوم البيانية حالات خاصة من الفضاءات المتصلة؛ بل إن الفضاءات المتصلة المحدودة هي تحديدًا الرسوم البيانية المحدودة.

مع ذلك، يمكن تحويل أي رسم بياني إلى فضاء طوبولوجي، وذلك بمعاملة الرؤوس كنقاط والحواف كنسخ من الفترة [1] (انظر نظرية الرسم البياني الطوبولوجية#الرسوم البيانية كفضاءات طوبولوجية ). عندئذٍ، يمكن إثبات أن الرسم البياني متصل (بالمعنى النظري للرسم البياني) إذا وفقط إذا كان متصلاً كفضاء طوبولوجي.

توجد أشكال أقوى من الترابط للفضاءات الطوبولوجية ، على سبيل المثال:

• إذا لم توجد مجموعتان مفتوحتان غير فارغتين منفصلتان في فضاء طوبولوجي${\displaystyle X}$،${\displaystyle X}$يجب أن تكون متصلة، وبالتالي فإن المساحات فائقة الترابط تكون متصلة أيضاً.
• بما أن الفضاء المتصل ببساطة ، بحكم تعريفه، يتطلب أيضاً أن يكون متصلاً عبر مسار، فإن أي فضاء متصل ببساطة يكون متصلاً أيضاً. وإذا تم حذف شرط "اتصال المسار" من تعريف الاتصال البسيط، فإن الفضاء المتصل ببساطة لا يحتاج إلى أن يكون متصلاً.
• لكنّ النسخ الأقوى من الاتصال تتضمن مفهوم الفضاء القابل للانكماش . كل فضاء قابل للانكماش متصل بمسارات، وبالتالي فهو متصل أيضاً.

بشكل عام، أي فضاء متصل بمسار يجب أن يكون متصلاً، ولكن توجد فضاءات متصلة ليست متصلة بمسار. يُعد فضاء المشط المحذوف مثالاً على ذلك، وكذلك منحنى الجيب الطوبولوجي المذكور أعلاه.

الفضاء المتسلسل جيدًا هو فضاء متري يمكن فيه ربط أي نقطتين عشوائيتين بسلسلة من النقاط المتقاربة بشكل عشوائي. بينما أي مجموعة متسلسلة جيدًا${\displaystyle X}$مرتبط، ^{[ 16 ] : الفصل الأول §8،} والعكس ليس صحيحًا (مثال على ذلك هو${\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} }$).

• المكون المتصل (نظرية الرسم البياني) - رسم بياني فرعي أقصى يمكن أن تصل رؤوسه إلى بعضها البعض. صفحات تعرض أوصافًا مختصرة لأهداف إعادة التوجيه 
• موقع الترابط
• Domain (mathematical analysis) – Connected open subset of a topological space
• Extremally disconnected space – Topological space in which the closure of every open set is open
• Locally connected space – Property of topological spaces
• n-connected
• Uniformly connected space – Type of uniform space
• Pixel connectivity

• Bredon, G.E. (2013). Topology and Geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 139. Springer Science & Business Media.
• إنجلكينج، ريشارد (1989). الطوبولوجيا العامة (طبعة منقحة ومكتملة  ). ليمجو: دار نشر هيلدرمان. ISBN 3-88538-006-4.
• مسقط، ج؛ بوهاجيار، د (2006). "الفضاءات المتصلة" (ملف PDF) . مذكرات كلية العلوم والهندسة، جامعة شيماني، السلسلة ب: العلوم الرياضية . 39 : 1-13 . مؤرشف من الأصل (ملف PDF) بتاريخ 4 مارس 2016. تم الاطلاع عليه بتاريخ 17 مايو 2010 ..
• وايلدر، آر إل (1978). "تطور المفهوم الطوبولوجي لـ "المتصل"". المجلة الرياضية الأمريكية الشهرية . 85 (9): 720– 726. doi : 10.2307/2321676 . JSTOR 2321676 . 
• ويلارد، ستيفن (1970). الطوبولوجيا العامة . ريدينغ، ماساتشوستس: أديسون-ويسلي. ISBN 0-486-43479-6.